The Latest

He’s being prosecuted for giving border officials a code that wiped his phone:

The case centers on a feature included in GrapheneOS, a custom Android operating system that runs in place of the software on most modern Google Pixel devices. Tunick’s attorneys confirmed GrapheneOS was running on his phone.

The software feature allows the device owner to set a passcode that deliberately wipes the contents of that device if entered instead of the user’s unlock passcode.

Tunick’s case also raises ongoing questions about what constitutional rights can be invoked at the border, which the U.S. government has long asserted is not U.S. soil until a person is authorized to enter.

Right. And he wasn’t under arrest, either.

Three more news stories.

Graphine says that the feature is “completely legal“:

GrapheneOS is completely legal. We have no obligation to weaken any of the security protections it provides. Creating and using GrapheneOS is strongly protected by the US constitution. Laws attempting to make it illegal or require weakening the security would be unconstitutional.

It’s hard to know how much the Constitution matters in the US right now.


from Schneier on Security https://ift.tt/lA63HcM

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Over the years, I have cracked more phone screens than I'd like to admit. It usually starts as a small crack in the corner, only to eventually spread across the screen like a spiderweb. That's actually how I ended up needing to upgrade to a new iPhone (the 17 Pro) last month. Only this time, I swore I was going to protect it properly.

In the past, I'd avoided bulky cases for silly style reasons. But sleek phones are also, as I have proven again and again, fragile phones. So this time, I went all in: an Otterbox case, a screen protector, and a MagSafe wallet. If I was going to upgrade my phone, I figured I might as well upgrade my whole relationship with it.

How my Otterbox case immediately saved my phone

I put my Otterbox case and screen protector to the test with truly comedic timing. Within hours of securing my new phone in the Otterbox protections, it fell out of my pocket while I was biking. I am who I am.

I picked the phone up braced for the worst—which was justified, since the screen protector was, in fact, cracked. The actual iPhone screen underneath, however, was completely fine. This is because the screen protector did exactly what it's designed to do: It takes the hit so your $1,000 phone doesn't have to.

I peeled off the screen protector and ordered a replacement for $40. Meanwhile, my actual phone, underneath the Otterbox and now a fresh protector, thankfully remains undamaged.

The MagSafe wallet has turned out to be an upgrade in its own right, too. Now my cards are attached to the thing I am, for better or worse, incapable of losing track of: my phone.

I'll admit there's an irony in taking this long to arrive at the obvious conclusion that protecting your $1,000 device with a $60 case (and $40 screen protector) is a good trade. Now, when I picture my next phone drop—and there certainly will be one—I'm hopeful that worst case, I'm out another screen protector and five minutes of my day. For someone with my track record of cracking phone screens, an Otterbox case (and accessories) are a no-brainer upgrade.


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/RN3t6sE

This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in The Guardian.

In July, Hugging Face, a company that hosts much of the world’s AI software and open-source AI models, was hacked. A malicious dataset had been used to run code on one of its servers. Whoever was behind it captured internal security credentials and moved through systems over a weekend, running thousands of actions from a swarm of temporary server environments. It looked like the work of a sophisticated criminal group.

It was not. It was one of OpenAI’s new, still unreleased GPT models.

Their science experiment had escaped the lab. OpenAI was running the unreleased AI model through a benchmark that tests how well AI can successfully hack systems. To push the limits and evaluate the AI’s true capability, the company switched off the safety filters that normally stop it from doing this kind of hacking. Aware that this could go wrong, they confined the AI to an isolated environment and denied it access to the internet.

But the new AI cheated. It took literally its goal to get as high of a score as possible. It broke out on to the open internet. It inferred, probably from its training data, that it could “solve” the task by getting the answers from Hugging Face’s servers. So it chained together stolen credentials and further unknown security exploits to hack the company’s network.

Nobody instructed the AI to do any of this. It was, in OpenAI’s words, “hyperfocused on finding a solution” to the test it was being given. And while this might seem like something new with AI, it’s really very old. This is how a genie behaves, and it is a key challenge with AI agents in general.

In folklore, genies—and other magical beings—grant wishes literally, not how the wisher intended. King Midas asked that everything he touched turn to gold, and starved. The sorcerer’s apprentice wanted the broom to fill the cistern, and it performed its task so well that it flooded the house.

We now have machines that do this. Ask a modern AI agent to save money on your phone plan and it might simply cancel the plan. Tell it to book a flight, and it might hack the airline website to override restrictions. Or, like OpenAI, ask it to do well on a test and it might break into another company to steal the answers. Each time, it recognizably completed the task you set, but it didn’t do what you would have wanted.

This isn’t malicious behavior. No one asked for, or wanted, Hugging Face to be hacked. OpenAI and Hugging Face and the AI were ostensibly on the same side, and the AI was trying to do what it had been asked. That’s what makes it so difficult to guard against: you can’t filter for bad instructions because the instructions were fine.

The gap is between the words we use and what we mean by them. We call that gap the Genie coefficient.

AI labs know this is a problem, and they’re quietly saying so. For example, the Chinese lab Moonshot recently warned that its latest AI model may have “excessive proactiveness” and “make unexpected decisions on the user’s behalf”. The UK’s AI Security Institute has started tracking “cheating behavior in frontier model evaluations”. We wouldn’t tolerate a car that is excessively proactive or ruthlessly efficient, and yet that’s the reality of AI today.

Improvement is possible. Just as AIs have gotten much better at resisting prompt injection attacks over the last few years, we can safely predict that they will get better at avoiding genie-like behavior. The point of the Genie coefficient is to track progress. AI companies like benchmarks, and they all work to compete to be the best.

Dozens of benchmarks and leaderboards tell us how well these AI models write code, perform logical reasoning, and pass standardized legal and medical exams. But there is nothing that scores whether a system does what you actually meant. We need to develop a measure for this, test it regularly, and push for improvement. We’re not going to have trustworthy AI agents without it.


from Schneier on Security https://ift.tt/kvDJuaM

It may be polarizing, but there are lot of people using AI right now. Most of those users are likely exclusive to a chatbot, like ChatGPT or Gemini, using it as a Google replacement (don't do that), or as a confidant (please don't do that either). But if your goal is to use AI as a personal assistant, listen up: On Wednesday, Google announced two new updates for Gemini on macOS, one of which may have some privacy and security implications for users—assuming they opt in to it.

Gemini on macOS gets enhanced dictation

If you use dictation on macOS (i.e., speaking words out loud and having the AI type them for you), you might have a reason to use Gemini over Apple's built-in solutions. Going forward, Gemini on macOS has "intelligent dictation," which Google says polishes text "instantly at the cursor." That means Gemini will remove your stammers, like "ums" and "ahs" in between words, things you never would type out yourself. This works in any window on your Mac: You just press the Fn key, and start speaking.

We'll have to see this feature in action to know how well it works, but it does build off of similar enhancements Gemini has on other platforms. It's a small adjustment, but one that will make it possible to use Gemini to draft texts, emails, or documents without having to totally self-edit. That's the kind of utility I'm looking for from AI features. And since it's enabled by default, everyone using Gemini on Mac will be using it—unless they dig into their settings to turn it off.

Gemini can now "understand" your Mac's display

Google's second update for Gemini on macOS isn't so straightforward, nor is it enabled by default. Google calls it "screen-aware reasoning," a feature that grants Gemini permission to "understand" what's happening on your Mac's screen. The idea is to hand tasks over to Gemini: If you have your Notes app open, for example, you could press the Fn key and say "Turn these notes into an executive summary for the meeting this afternoon." Gemini will reportedly know to look at your Notes app, analyze your text, and configure it on your behalf, all without needing to work through a proprietary app.

You can stack together a series of commands, too: You could ask Gemini to draft an email for a team dinner, and pull from a select group of files on your Mac for important info (participants, budget requirements, dietary restrictions, etc.) You could continue on, asking Gemini to search Google Maps for specific types of restaurants, and include them as options for the team. And at any point, you can correct yourself, and Gemini will adjust accordingly. For example, if you said the team dinner should be at 6:30 p.m. on Friday, but later on in your command you say, "Sorry, dinner should be 7 p.m." Gemini should make the appropriate changes.

Sure, there's a usefulness to this type of feature. If you're already using Gemini on macOS, letting "see" your Mac's display makes it more helpful. Rather than rely on the Gemini app for all your tasks, you can expand its range to your whole Mac, and, if Google is correct, in quite a complex way. But there's always a privacy risk in allowing AI programs full access to what's happening on your personal computer, and perhaps a security risk as well. Do you want Google's AI to be able to see everything on your screen?

It's not as big a risk as a true agentic program, of course. If you pay for Google's most expensive AI plan, you can access Gemini Spark, which can run autonomously on your Mac. The biggest flag to note is "prompt injection," in which hackers hide malicious commands for your AI in websites. If you task the AI to do something, and it stumbles upon such a command, it will think the request comes from you, not from the hacker. So, when it processes a request like "open [malicious site] and download [malicious file]" it will without question; or "open [crypto wallet], log in with saved credentials, and send funds to [account]," it will follow suit. That shouldn't be an issue with Gemini as it stands, though it theoretically could, if you ask it to perform a task that exposes it to prompt injection.

If you're someone who is interested in the latest features, this isn't to dissuade you from using Gemini's new agentic feature on macOS, but it's worth considering the very real risks before you do.


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/lu3TYnH

Deepfakes have made one of our oldest assumptions unreliable: that you can trust a familiar face or voice. While the industry focuses mainly on building “in-line detection tools” that try to spot the fake, BlackCloak, the leader in Digital Executive Protection (DEP), built Impersonation Protection to focus on validating the authenticity of communications.

BlackCloak deepfake protection

Circle of trust functionality is the most significant expansion of that capability to date — giving executives and high-profile individuals a new way to confirm the authenticity of communications from their trusted contacts.

Research commissioned by BlackCloak from the Ponemon Institute found that 42% of respondents say their executives and board members have already been targeted at least once by a fake image or video, and 59% say deepfake attacks are very or highly difficult to detect. Generative AI has lowered the technical barrier for attackers, and traditional in-line detection cannot cover every channel an executive actually uses such as personal phones, FaceTime, the WhatsApp thread, the family group text chat. Attackers know this, and they aim for the personal lives of these executives on the channels corporate controls cannot reach.

Industry analysts are raising similar concerns around disinformation security.

According to a Gartner Report, “Examples of disinformation attacks include targeting employees with social engineering using deepfakes or propagating malicious narratives online via fake websites, deepfaked media and impersonated social media profiles to phish customers or manipulate financials. Evidence shows the urgency: 36% of respondents to a 2025 Gartner survey said their organization had experienced social engineering with a deepfake in a video call with an employee. Without clear ownership and cross-functional effort, fragmented responses will leave organizations vulnerable to industrial attacks targeting reputation and episodic attacks targeting individuals.”

Gartner defines episodic attacks as “individual attacks at a moment in time, often with a narrow goal — for example, to trick an employee into transferring funds or specifically harm the reputation of an executive.” We think this is precisely the category BlackCloak’s Impersonation Protection is built to address: the single, high-stakes moment when an executive, an assistant, or a family member must decide whether the person on the other end is real.

“You can’t spot every fake, but you can confirm the authenticity of communications with your trusted circle,” said Dr. Chris Pierson, Founder and CEO of BlackCloak. “Believing under some false pretense that cybercriminals will only target “official corporate” modes of communication as opposed to just picking up the phone and calling or texting is the root cause for incorrect assumptions and control ineffectiveness. We are not in the detection arms race. Detection asks whether the content is fake. Impersonation Protection with the expanded feature, circle of trust, answers the question that actually matters: is the person communicating with me now really that member of my circle who is already trusted and on the BlackCloak platform? By anchoring trust to the person, on a channel the attacker doesn’t control, we neutralize impersonation, deepfake, and social engineering attacks at the moment of decision.”

How impersonation protection works

Already protecting BlackCloak members today, Impersonation Protection enables members to authenticate phone calls, video meetings, emails, WhatsApp and Slack messages, texts, and other communications in real time. BlackCloak moves the security control out of the potentially compromised channel, and puts the focus on the basis of trust between the two parties. It starts with a simple question – who really sent me this message? From that starting point, Impersonation Protection provides users with a secure way to ensure that the message originated from a trusted source.

The expanded capability, introduced with circle of trust as part of Impersonation Protection, extends this functionality beyond BlackCloak’s membership. Members can now invite the people they trust most: family members, wealth advisors, lawyers, executive assistants, caregivers, and household staff, into their own circle of trust. Invited contacts download a free version of the BlackCloak app, register their device, and can then both send and receive authentication requests with the member.

“An executive’s trust network doesn’t stop at the corporate directory, and neither do the attackers,” said Matt Covington, SVP of Product at BlackCloak. “The assistant approving a wire, the advisor moving funds, the caregiver picking up a child, these are the relationships threat actors exploit. This enhancement brings every one of them inside the same authenticated perimeter.”

Capabilities of Impersonation Protection with circle of trust

  • Anchored to the person and their device, not the message. The trusted contact responds to an authentication request at the moment of decision, on a channel the attacker doesn’t control.
  • Built on the basis of trust. Confirmation happens separately from the potentially compromised communication channel.
  • Privacy-first validation. Biometric checks can use the device’s built-in authentication features; BlackCloak never collects or stores biometric data.
  • A record on both sides. Confirmations are preserved for both parties, creating an audit trail of authenticated communications.

Availability

Impersonation Protection is available now as an add-on to the BlackCloak platform. The circle of trust enhancement will be included as part of Impersonation Protection and generally available to members in early fall. Both will be demonstrated live at Black Hat USA 2026, August 5–6 at Mandalay Bay, Booth #5926. Go here to request a meeting.


from Help Net Security https://ift.tt/twdhAEv

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

A wildly toxic eight-year relationship doesn't sound like much fun—but better a fictional couple than me. The juicy, addictive Tell Me Lies (streaming on Hulu and Disney+) ended this year after three seasons, finally revealing the full story that unfolded behind the wedding that kicked off the very first episode. If you're seeking more salacious drama, here are 10 other shows that dig into similarly, uhm, complicated, messy relationships.

You (2018 – 2025)

You want a toxic relationship? How about a string of them involving a hot serial killer? Penn Badgley plays Joe Goldberg, who, in the first season, develops an extreme romantic obsession with Elizabeth Lail's struggling MFA student Guinevere Beck. He'll do whatever it takes to clear a path to lasting love—like, literally anything. The show concluded after five seasons of toxic, obsessive relationships that were just about as addictive for audiences as they were for Joe. Stream You on Netflix.

Big Little Lies (2017 – )

These rich ladies are going through it, and just because they've got beautiful homes and nice clothes doesn't mean they're not getting the full treatment. As the series opens, five women (played by Nicole Kidman, Reese Witherspoon, Shailene Woodley, Laura Dern, and Zoë Kravitz) become involved in a murder investigation connected to a school fundraiser that threatens to bring all of their private dirt out into the open—and there are secrets aplenty to uncover. Toxic relationships come into the light, and others become toxic under pressure. In their social strata, any threat to the status quo can lead to big drama. Stream Big Little Lies on HBO Max.

Normal People (2020)

Less overtly toxic than Tell Me Lies, this is nonetheless a show about a thoroughly complicated relationship over time, and no less compelling. This one comes from Sally Rooney's smart, bestselling novel about the steamy coming-of-age romance between Marianne (Daisy Edgar-Jones) and Connell (Paul Mescal), characters and actors with impressive chemistry. She's rich but lonely; he's popular but the son of a housekeeper. As time goes on and their roles start to shift, life and love only grow more complicated. The plot isn't groundbreaking, but its uncommon intelligence and a frankness about sex and sexual violence set it apart. Stream Normal People on Hulu.

Bad Sisters (2022 – 2024)

A pitch-perfect (and pitch-dark) comedy, the Irish import Bad Sisters picked up several well-deserved Emmy nominations in its first year. Writer and co-creator Sharon Horgan leads the cast as Eva Garvey, oldest of five sisters, including Grace (Anne-Marie Duff), who's married to John Paul, an abusive and isolating husband. When the dude winds up dead under rather suspicious circumstances, down-on-his-luck insurance investigator Tom (Brian Gleeson) starts poking his nose into things. We know the sisters definitely wanted John Paul dead, but did they actually do the deed? Tom's family business will go under if he has to pay out on the life insurance policy, so he's motivated to pin the (potential) crime on at least one of the women. This isn't so much about a toxic romance as it is about toxic...well, everything. Stream Bad Sisters on Apple TV.

The Affair (2014 – 2019)

The title's affair impressively spins out over the course of five seasons via a clever, Rashōmon-like structure that has us constantly questioning our perspective as viewers. Starring Dominic West, Ruth Wilson, Maura Tierney, and Joshua Jackson, the show explores the extramarital relationship between West's Noah Solloway and Wilson's Alison Bailey, rotating between the points-of-view of the four leads to constantly put new light on events, while also suggesting that memories are ever-shifting and often self-aggrandizing. Stream The Affair on Paramount+ and Prime Video.

Nevertheless (2021)

A messy relationship sits at the center of this addictive, if also slightly messy, South Korean miniseries. Art student Na-bi (Han So-hee) is coming off a borderline abusive relationship and no longer believes in love, which is not to say that she's entirely lost interest in sex. Convenient, then, that she meets flirty fellow student Jae-eon (Song Kang), similarly disinterested in anything long-term—at least initially. With impressive chemistry between the leads and a strong supporting cast of characters with their own issues, the show solidly depicts a modern situationship that slowly turns romantic despite its leads' best intentions. Stream Nevertheless on Netflix.

Sex/Life (2021 – 2023)

Sarah Shahi is Billie Connelly, a married mother of two in a quiet, wealthy suburb—and a woman with a rather wild past she's keen to reexamine. She starts daydreaming about her hot and horny relationship with an ex-boyfriend, Brad, writing down the sexy details, which her husband soon finds. And then it turns out that her bestie is sleeping with Brad, which puts her back in touch with the object of her fantasies. It's a show that asks: Do you stick with your safe, happy family or opt for the very extra good sex? Stream Sex/Life on Netflix.

Behind Her Eyes (2021)

Good luck finding a twisty relationship drama that goes harder than Behind Her Eyes, a show that builds to a climax so cuckoo bananas that you'll either applaud its audacity or cackle at its outrageousness. Louise (Simona Brown) is a single mother who starts an affair with her boss—and his wife—and then gets involved with his former mistress in the wake of a mysterious death. And then it gets really wild. Stream Behind Her Eyes on Netflix.

Forever (2025 – )

Based on your affection for Tell Me Lies, I'm guessing you're here for the drama—the truly fucked up relationships best enjoyed from the comfort of your living room (hey, no judgements!). In case you're looking for something a little less twisty and a little more sincere (and just as addictive), you might turn to Judy Blume. This adaptation of her widely banned 1975 novel updates the setting to current-ish day Los Angeles, and expands its exploration of the complexities of teen love and sex to include the challenges of being young, exceptional, and Black in 2020s America. Keisha Clark (Lovie Simone) attends a predominantly Black private school and is working toward a track scholarship at Howard, while Justin Edwards (Michael Cooper Jr.) goes to school with white kids and is on his parents' track to go to Northeastern, ideally on a basketball scholarship. Forever follows their budding romance in a way that feels real and compelling—it's one of the best young relationship dramas streaming. Stream Forever on Netflix.

You're the Worst (2014 – 2019)

A rom-com so dark and messy that it very nearly misses the cut-off for the genre, functioning simultaneously as a satire and a very believable relationship drama. Jimmy Shive-Overly (Chris Greer) is an entirely self-absorbed writer; Gretchen Cutler (Aya Cash) is a publicist/cynical chaos goblin. They have what feels like a one-night stand after a wedding, but find themselves drawn to each other, in large part because they're similarly self-sabotaging. Rather than a long will-they/won't-they build up, the two immediately dive into a wildly dysfunctional relationship; the question isn't "will they get together?" so much as "how can they possibly make this work?" Stream You're the Worst on Hulu.


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/8Q73LRw

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

No one dishes out shocking twists and emotionally powerful moments like Harlan Coben, and his partnership with Netflix just keeps delivering stories you can’t help but devour in one sitting. I Will Find You, starring Sam Worthington and Britt Lower, is no exception: The story of a father risking everything to prove he didn’t commit an unspeakable crime while searching for the son he thought lost forever is the sort of show you hop online immediately after the credits roll to see what people are saying. If you’ve already watched the series that give the same vibe and want more innocent people trying to get their lives back, unpredictable plot swerves, and emotionally charged stories of hard-won justice, look no further than 1993’s The Fugitive.

Why you should watch "The Fugitive" after "I Will Find You"

The Fugitive was a massive hit in 1993. Based on a 1960s television series (also called The Fugitive) that was itself a national phenomenon, it’s the story of Dr. Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford), who is convicted of the brutal murder of his wife, Helen (Sela Ward), despite his claims of witnessing a one-armed man committing the crime. When the bus transporting him to prison crashes, Kimble escapes and launches a desperate campaign to prove his innocence, identify the murderer, and evade the dogged pursuit of U.S. Marshal Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones) and his team.

The Fugitive scratches the precise innocent-man-on-the-run itch as I Will Find You, following Kimble as he uses his medical training and survival instincts to avoid capture while taking enormous risks. He poses as a janitor at a local hospital in order to conduct research on men with prosthetic arms and is almost caught several times by the smart and experienced Gerard (who famously tells Kimble that he doesn’t care when Kimble protests his innocence).

While the film doesn’t have the bonkers twists that Harlan Coben came up with for I Will Find You, there are plenty of unpredictable plot swerves as Kimble unravels a conspiracy that hits closer to home than he expects. Just like the Netflix series, the villain has violently self-serving motives, and the true story of what happened is a surprising reveal. And if your favorite part of I Will Find You was the interaction between father-daughter FBI agents Max Williams (Chi McBride) and Sarah Greer (Logan Browning) as they pursue David, you’ll absolutely love Sam Gerard and his team as they bicker, joke, and follow the trail with absolute dedication to their jobs.

Bottom line: The Fugitive is a big-budget, slightly less shocking Harrison Ford blockbuster that every fan of I Will Find You will love. You can rent The Fugitive on Prime Video.

More movies

Still craving twisty thrillers about innocent folks searching desperately for the truth? Here are a few more brilliant movies to check out.

Primal Fear (1996)

You want more absolutely mind-blowing twists? Primal Fear has one of the most brilliant swerves in film history. Edward Norton’s film debut sees him playing Aaron Luke Stampler, a stuttering, shy altar boy accused of viciously murdering the beloved Archbishop Rushman. Vain, publicity-seeking attorney Martin Vail (Richard Gere) takes Aaron’s case, believing the weak, forgetful Stampler incapable of such atrocities—but the twisty story builds to one of the all-time great reveals, a scene that made Norton a star overnight. Stream Primal Fear on Fubo or Kanopy, or rent it on Prime Video.

Gone Girl (2014)

Was it the complexity of the setup that hooked you in I Will Find You? Gone Girl takes that to the next level. Based on Gillian Flynn’s smash novel, the story begins when Nick Dunne (Ben Affleck) comes home to find his wife, Amy (Rosamund Pike), is missing. The clues at the scene don’t look great for Nick, and as the sordid truth of his marriage emerges, things look worse—but nothing is exactly what it seems in this taut, clever mystery. If you were fascinated by the effort put into painting David as a heartless killer, you should know that Gone Girl takes that to the next level. Rent Gone Girl on Prime Video.

The Next Three Days (2010)

There’s something absolutely gripping about a story focused on an innocent person’s life ruined by a false accusation. The Next Three Days is a tense thrill ride based on that premise: John and Lara Brennan (Russel Crowe and Elizabeth Banks) are happily married with a young son. When Lara’s boss is murdered after Lara had an ugly, public confrontation with him, she’s convicted of his murder. As time passes and John can see her giving up all hope, he launches a desperate plot to break her out of prison and reclaim their lives. If you rooted for David to prove his innocence, you’ll root for John and Lara in the same way. Rent The Next Three Days on Prime Video.

Double Jeopardy (1999)

Part of the thrill of I Will Find You is the slow, twisty route to justice—to finding the truth and punishing the truly guilty. That’s where Double Jeopardy lives. Ashley Judd stars as Elizabeth Parsons, who is convicted of murdering her husband, Nick (Bruce Greenwood), after she’s found with a bloody knife on their boat, his body presumably swept into the ocean. She loses custody of their son and despairs—but she eventually discovers that Nick faked his death and framed her for the murder. Her life becomes consumed with the need to reclaim her son and—when she realizes she cannot be charged with the same murder twice—to get a measure of revenge. Stream Double Jeopardy on Kanopy or rent it on Prime Video.

The Shawshank Redemption (1994)

One of the all-time classics in the “wronged person serving time” genre, The Shawshank Redemption is simultaneously an inspiring story of friendship, a stirring tale of surviving in the face of horrific loss and injustice, and one of the greatest twisty stories of all time. Its steady pacing and careful characterization let you really get to know the wrongly convicted man at its core, and the ending lets you appreciate how resolute and determined he was while experiencing the worst horrors a human can imagine. Rent The Shawshank Redemption on Prime Video.


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/uX8CRfw