The Latest

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Powered by the M6 chip, the compact 2026 Mac mini is currently 13% off at Amazon, dropping its price to $779.99 from $899. That gives shoppers in the Apple ecosystem a small but mighty computer, meant for home offices and creative workspaces short on desk space.

The entry-level model pairs a 12-core CPU and 12-core GPU with 16GB of unified memory and a modest 256GB SSD, but its speed and five-by-five-inch footprint help make up for the limited storage. If you want to upgrade to the 512GB model, you can still get a 14% discount, although it costs $170 more. The Mac mini supports up to three monitors and can handle everyday work and multitasking.

It comes in a sleek aluminum enclosure with rounded corners, and the metal case sits atop a rubberized plastic base lined with cooling vents. It has front-facing USB-C ports and a headphone jack, as well as plenty of connectivity options, including Thunderbolt 4, HDMI, 2.5Gb Ethernet, wifi 7, and Bluetooth 6. For those with iPhones, iPads, and other Apple devices, it also offers seamless integration. PCMag, which gave it an Editors’ Choice award, praises its ability to stay cool and quiet under load, along with its impressive CPU and GPU performance.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team

from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/yclBLoN

Matthew Green has a new site that tries to estimate the number of cryptanalyst-hours that have been spent analyzing different public-key algorithms:

Abstract: We estimate how much public cryptanalysis each public-key assumption has received, using the literature itself as the instrument. From roughly sixteen thousand candidate papers we classify cryptanalytic work on ECDLP, structured and plain lattices, syndrome decoding and their comparators, then convert papers into estimated research-allocation years through a person-level author map. These publication-based estimates may substantially overstate actual time spent. Lattices have overtaken elliptic curves in this cumulative measure only recently; we express that history as inference budgets under stated productivity assumptions. The study was conducted by AI models: Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5 built the pipeline, ran the analysis and wrote this page, with contributions from GPT-6 Astra. Matthew Green set the questions, made the key methodological decisions and oversaw the work.

There are a lot of caveats to this analysis. It relies on published work, so anything unpublished does not count. This includes both academic cryptanalysis that didn’t result in a paper, and intelligence agency cryptanalysis done in secret. But it’s a good first stab at a metric of this sort.


from Schneier on Security https://ift.tt/3Y0Un4X

The worst thing about your favorite chat app is trying to get your friends and family to use it. WhatsApp may be the most popular messaging platform in the world, but in the United States, it is hardly universally adopted. On the contrary, you'll find plenty of people who don't use it at all. In short, it's difficult to get a whole group to commit to any one platform, which can make casual video calls frustrating: If you don't use WhatsApp, and your friends are hosting a call, what are you supposed to do? You can't join a WhatsApp call without a WhatsApp account.

That's now changing. Meta, WhatsApp's parent company, announced "guest calling" on Wednesday. Now, any WhatsApp user can invite any non-WhatsApp user to a call, even if the recipient doesn't have an account. These calls still get the same core perks as traditional WhatsApp calls, Meta says: They're free and end-to-end encrypted, so you won't be compromising on your privacy by calling a non-WhatsApp user this way.

Non-WhatsApp users are still limited. Meta says these users always need a call host's approval to join. If you're a non-WhatsApp user, you'll find yourself in a waiting room until the call host lets you in. Meta also says that you can be kicked off the call at any time, and you won't be able to see other callers' phone numbers. You won't be able to send messages or add other users to the call. You are purely a participant.

How to invite someone without a WhatsApp account to a WhatsApp call

If you're trying to add a non-WhatsApp user to a call, first head to the Calls tab in the app. Here, hit (+), create a call link, then send it to the recipient. Meta says the user can open the link in their computer browser, enter their name, and join. This applies to one-on-one calls as well as calls with up to 32 people. While guests will have the aforementioned limits, they do have some features available to them. They can share their screen, react with emojis, or raise their hand.

WhatsApp isn't the first chat app to offer such a feature. Apple's FaceTime platform, for example, lets you create call links that anyone can join, whether they're calling in on an Apple device or a device running Android or Windows (or Linux, for that matter).


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/X0hKkBc

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

It turns out the kids can't get enough of John Steinbeck. The Florence Pugh-led, Zoe Kazan-created adaptation of his novel East of Eden has been a massive hit for Netflix, its epic story covering decades in the lives of two California families in the run-up to World War I. And why not? It's got grand family drama and plenty of sex, set against a massive historical backdrop and stuffed with biblical allusions that make it all feel like less of a guilty pleasure. If this is your bag, here are more similar shows to stream after you've finished your binge-watch.

The House of the Spirits (2026)

One generation will inevitably influence those that follow, for better and worse—sins and strengths in equal measure, dramatized most succinctly, perhaps, by Steinbeck's East of Eden and in Isabel Allende's seminal novel, adapted here (indicentally, both books are among the most frequently challenged in the United States). Told from the perspective of Alba (Rochi Hernández), House of the Spirits starts in the 1970s and works backward as Alba explores four generations of family history through he journals of her grandmother, Clara (Dolores Fonzi). Though their country is never named, Allende based it all on the real history of Chile through those decades of political violence and upheaval, and on her own family's triumphs and tragedies in its wake. Stream The House of the Spirits on Prime Video.

War and Peace (2016)

The most recent adaptation of Leo Tolstoy's epic, and a pretty good one. We begin in 1805, during the height of the Napoleonic Wars, meeting Pierre (Paul Dano), the idealistic illegitimate son of an oligarch; romantic and impulsive dancer Natasha (Lily James); and thoughtful, high-minded Andrei (James Norton), destined to become a soldier. Throughout the years of war that follow, the three of them and their families move in and out of each other's lives, as tragedy alternately unites and divides them. Stream War and Peace on Peacock and Prime Video.

Pachinko (2022 – )

Starting in 1915, this multigenerational saga follows one woman (played in different time periods by Youn Yuh-jung and Kim Min-ha) and her family, taking us from the Japanese occupation of Korea through the decades of the Korean diaspora. With her opportunities limited, Sunja leaves her home and family in Busan to pursue a life in Japan, even as racism and anti-immigrant sentiment are rampant amid the war. In a parallel narrative that begins in 1989, we see what has and hasn't changed for Sunja and her family. It’s a journey as personal as it is epic, with better location cinematography than most movies. Stream Pachinko on Apple TV.

The Forsyte Saga (2002 – 2003)

I haven't been the biggest fan of the newer adaptation of the John Galsworthy novels—though The Forsytes has already been renewed for a further two seasons, so I'm apparently in the minority. Nevertheless, I'll direct you back to 2002 and this extended miniseries led by Damian Lewis. It starts off in 1884 when the slightly scandalous engagement of one of the wealthy new-money Forsytes is marred by the revelation of an affair between cousin Joylon (Rupert Graves) and the governess, kicking off an impossibly complicated series of events that plagues the family for decades. Author Galsworthy was inspired to write by his own extramarital affair, so the drama is in the show's DNA. Stream The Forsyte Saga on Netflix.

When Life Gives You Tangerines (2025)

An epic love story that cleaned house at the 2025 Baeksang Arts Awards (that's South Korea's most prestigious entertainment award ceremony), Tangerines stars IU as Oh Ae-sun (and as Ae-sun's daughter and the series' narrator, Geum-myeong), a young woman born in the 1960s on rural Jeju Island. The series spans decades in her life with friend and later romantic interest Yang Gwan-sik (Park Bo-gum), as South Korea changes around them. The focus is more on Ae-sun's own love story than some of these broader narratives, but the scope is epic all the same. Stream When Life Gives You Tangerines on Netflix.

North & South (2004)

Not to be confused with the American Civil War miniseries North and South from the 1980s, this series adapts Elizabeth Gaskell's 1851 novel that follows Margaret Hale (Daniela Denby-Ashe) and her family, forced to leave their Hampshire home and travel to the industrial north of England to avoid religious scandal involving the clergyman father. Poor but well-educated, Margaret runs up against the wealthy owner of the local mill, John Thornton (Richard Armitage), whose family sees her as haughty despite her circumstances; meanwhile, hers sees John and his peers as gruff and inhumane where workers are concerned. Despite their very opposing views, you won't be surprised to learn that Margaret and John find themselves growing closer over the subsequent years, even as their families remain divided. Stream North & South on Prime Video and Tubi.

House of Guinness (2025 – )

There's plenty of upper-crust family drama in this loosely-based-on-real-events series, but it comes from Steven Knight (Peaky Blinders), so expect bloody fisticuffs, too. The first episode begins shortly after the death of Sir Benjamin Guinness, who became the wealthiest man in Ireland by expanding the trade in Guinness beer throughout the British Empire. The cracks begin to show on the way to the funeral: Religious leaders deplore all of the beer-drinking, while Irish Republicans want the company brought down for colluding with the Empire. Sir Benjamin's four heirs have wildly different goals and/or hate each other, so, you know—lots of drama, and lots of beer. The show has been renewed for a second season, so a second round is on the way. Stream House of Guinness on Netflix.

Roots (2016)

Subtitled The Saga of an American Family by Alex Haley in his novel, Roots, in any of its incarnations, is hard to top as an epic family drama grounded in history. Absolutely nothing can match the cultural importance of the 1977 miniseries, also an easy recommendation, which centered the generations-long story of a Black family at a time when such narratives were rare on television. The 2016 version couldn’t possibly have that kind of impact, but it works just the same: it's impressively acted and adds a modern polish that doesn’t detract from the story’s power. Covering much of the same ground, the newer version goes further in focusing on the American family at its center, spending less time leading white viewers into the story that begins with Kunta Kinte (Malachi Kirby) captured in Gambia and sold as chattel. There’s a very reasonable debate about the preponderance of slave narratives in film and television and the purpose they serve for white audiences; while both versions of Roots are unflinching in that area, they also go beyond it by engaging with what came before and after. Stream Roots on Prime Video and Tubi.

The Plot Against America (2020)

A dark turn down an alternate path in American history, The Plot Against America asks: what if Charles Lindbergh had succeeded in his bid for political power in the 1930s, bringing to bear his vision of an America that followed in the footsteps of Nazi Germany by halting the “infiltration of inferior blood” (by which he meant, mostly, Jewish people). Adapted from the book by Philip Roth, the series bends imagination with real history, depicting Lindbergh's successful campaign for the American presidency against Franklin D. Roosevelt, which ultimately keeps the U.S. out of World War II—and which results in things at home growing increasingly dangerous for the Jewish family at the show's center, which splinters between members who advocate for resistance, quiet acquiescence, or active participation. Morgan Spector, Zoe Kazan, Winona Ryder, and John Turturro star. Stream The Plot Against America on HBO Max.

The Thorn Birds (1983)

Rarely has so much drama been sparked by a herd of sheep, but here we are with this blockbuster miniseries adapting Colleen McCullough's novel in suitably grand style. It's set on a sheep station in the Australian outback over several decades in the 20th century. Rachel Ward plays Meggie Cleary, a tough but damaged young woman who becomes the de facto leader of her family after her father uproots the family from New Zealand to New South Wales to live and work on a ranch owned by her wealthy, widowed Aunt Mary (the legendary Barbara Stanwyck, whose performance lives on in "Kiss me on the mouth!" gif reactions). Both Mary and Meggie have eyes for the same man, Ralph de Bricassart (Richard Chamberlain), who just happens to be a priest. It's expensive, star-studded melodrama par excellence. Buy The Thorn Birds from Prime Video.


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/TsZmiQ4

Gemini 3.1 Pro launched back in February of this year—quite a while ago, in AI terms. Now Google has jumped to the next full number with Gemini 4 Argon, which it says "excels at deep work in complex, real-world tasks."

You can get the new AI model now inside the Gemini app if you're on the AI Pro ($19.99 a month) or AI Ultra ($99.99 or $199.99 a month) plans. Users on the free and AI Plus ($4.99 a month) plans miss out for now, though you can expect a smaller, cut-down version of Gemini 4 Argon to roll out to these tiers eventually.

What can Gemini 4 Argon do?

Google has a long list of areas where the new AI model excels. There's mention of complex engineering tasks (like checking millions of lines of code for efficiency improvements), predicting molecular structures in chemistry, and delivering 3D visualizations. It also enhances knowledge work across legal, finance, science, and coding.

Google says Gemini 4 Argon is now better at advanced physics modeling, picking through genetic databases, protecting software from vulnerabilities, and resolving problems in physical space (handy for robotics development). The new model "answers questions more directly with less hedging, doesn't repeat itself more than necessary, and skips clichés throughout the responses," according to Google.

Google Gemini
Gemini has some suggestions for how to use the new model. Credit: Lifehacker

With many in the industry worried about an AI-driven apocalypse of some form or another, Google has upped its defenses against misuse and jailbreaking. The company has significantly upgraded its blockers for harmful requests, limits on AI agent overreach, and resistance to malicious prompt injections.

All of these stats are things you would expect to read about in a new AI model announcement, whether it's from Google, Anthropic, or OpenAI: "Our new model is better and safer than ever, and particularly good in these specific benchmarks we've chosen." But is it any more helpful for the average user tapping away in the Gemini app?

I don't have any pressing scientific breakthroughs to research or large-scale software optimizations to run, but I have put Gemini 4 Argon to the test against GPT-6 Sol, which is the latest model available to consumers through the ChatGPT app—though you need to be on at least the Plus plan ($19.99 a month) to get to it.

Testing Gemini 4 Argon against GPT-6 Sol

Make no mistake: Both of these new AI models are quite capable. I first prompted Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-6 Sol with the following: "Using information online, create a web app I can run locally that plots the lighthouses of the world on a map. Clicking on a lighthouse should give me some details about it, show how far its light reaches, and display a simple 2D model showing its shape and height (if known). Put a lighthouse keeper in each model pop-up for scale."

At the highest, slowest levels of "thinking," these AIs took a while to get back to me: Nearly 10 minutes for Gemini and almost 26 minutes for ChatGPT. Both hit the same problem—restricted access to map data online—but both were able to make a rudimentary world map of their own when prompted a second time.

The ChatGPT effort, dubbed "Beacon," wasn't bad, apart from a bit of map clunkiness (it clearly needs to work on its cartography skills). It presented plenty of information, laid out everything well, and gave me nice, neat diagrams on each of the lighthouses featured. The day/night mode worked fine, and it was an impressive bit of coding work, even if it did take 26 minutes.

However, the Gemini effort, called "Pharos," was better in almost every respect. The map was more detailed, lighthouses actually showed their light range (with an impressive animation), and there was more information on each location—perhaps due to Google's expertise in web search. Some of the layout choices were a bit off, but Gemini 4 Argon produced what was clearly the superior app in less than half the time.

OpenAI ChatGPT
ChatGPT's lighthouse map was pretty good—but had its problems. Credit: Lifehacker

Next, I fed PDFs of 10 recent scientific studies into each AI model. The prompt: "Give me a brief summary of each of these studies in plain English, with a single sentence each for the main finding, one study strength, one study weakness, and the main implication." While I hadn't read the studies through entirely myself, I had read news stories on all of them, and I lowered the "thinking" level to low.

This time ChatGPT was faster—25 seconds versus Gemini's 55 seconds—and gave what I thought were the better summaries, at least for my purposes. Gemini did well, and its answers were accurate and to the point, but the summaries ChatGPT gave were easier to understand and shorter. ChatGPT also offered some overall thoughts on the most promising study, which Gemini didn't.

Finally, I checked the imagination and creative juices of the models: "With the success of the Apple TV shows Severance, Slow Horses, Silo, and Widow's Bay, give me five pitches for new show ideas on the platform that combine elements from some or all of these shows. Try and be as original as possible and keep each pitch to around 100 words." I put the "thinking" level back up to "high" for this job.

Google Gemini
Gemini's lighthouse map offered more information and a better layout. Credit: Lifehacker

(Is this how Apple TV executives actually get their ideas nowadays? I hope not.) As far as the answers the AIs gave me, Gemini was faster than ChatGPT (1 minute and 28 seconds against 3 minutes and 48 seconds, respectively), and both served up responses that were a bit more literal in their mashing up than I wanted: failed secret service agents and supernatural terrors abounded, which is I suppose what I asked for.

The ideas were mostly "Widow's Bay set somewhere else" or "Slow Horses set somewhere else," and didn't make a whole lot of sense for the most part, but the best Gemini offering was about a Silo-style underground bunker whose operators go through a Severance-style procedure every 24 hours: outside, the bunker protecting it from zombies by night; inside, the bunker planning social activities for residents by day. It's not perfect, but I might watch the trailer at least.

My favorite of the ChatGPT suggestions was a show about a remote, Severance-style weather station whose employees discover they're not recording the weather—they're creating it. Again, it didn't really logically hold up, but overall I found the suggestions from GPT-6 more nuanced, more likely to be an actual show, and better "thought" through. Maybe Gemini should've given itself more time to "think."

This is only a narrow set of quick tests, but, in my view, it seems Gemini is back to, at the very least, an even playing field with ChatGPT. It performed much better on the lighthouse task, though its summarizing and TV show pitching weren't quite as impressive. Access to the best models requires a subscription on both platforms, but if you're able to, it's worth comparing them against each other on the jobs you most commonly need AI for.


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/7aj2PUA

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Apple's new HomeView smart hub is fun. It looks like a cross between an iMac G4 and an Apple Watch, especially if you opt for the one with the stand—which you should probably do, seeing as the wall-mounted option requires separate hardware purchases. If you have more than one Apple user in the house, it's certainly a tempting product. But as sleek as the HomeView looks, I can't help but wonder: Is this really a better decision than an iPad on a stand?

After all, you can already control smart devices from the Home app on your iPad, not to mention take FaceTime calls, play music, check the weather, etc. And, since it's an iPad, it's inherently more versatile than a device made as a smart hub. Would you be better off buying one of Apple's tablets with a stand, and calling a day? The short answer: maybe, but not necessarily. After thinking it through, it might not make sense for everyone to splurge on the iPad in this scenario.

Feature crossover between the HomeView and iPad

Despite being a new product, there's a lot of crossover between the HomeView and your average iPad. They both support FaceTime, and both place the camera along the top bezel—at least, if you have one of Apple's modern iPads. (For years, the company put the camera along the short side of the iPad, which meant it was always off-center for landscape video calls.) They both run the Home app, which means both can control your compatible smart devices. You can access Apple Music on both devices, as well as the Messages app. To that point, they both run some of the same first and third-party apps, including Calendar, Weather, Podcasts, and Find My, but it's a bit too early to know the full list of compatible apps. That said, Apple told The Verge that any app that works with CarPlay and supports audio and video streaming will appear on your HomeView if you have it on your iPhone or iPad.

Both devices also come with Safari. That's obvious on the iPad, but it's a welcome addition on the HomeView. I'm not seeing much about how Safari works on HomeView, however, other than the fact you can tap "Start Cooking" on a recipe you find in the browser to see the steps in a "streamlined format." While you can do many things on HomeView with simple gestures and voice commands, Apple also includes an on-screen keyboard here, so the iPad isn't the only device of the pair you can type on. Depending on the iPad, HomeView might actually be on-par power-wise, as well: Apple outfitted this device with the A18 chip, one generation newer than the A17 Pro in the iPad mini, and two generations newer than the chip in the A16 iPad. That runs Apple Intelligence and Siri AI, a big selling point for Apple with this device. Like other smart displays, the company wants you to ask Siri AI complex questions and make requests across your apps. That's something you can do on certain iPads too, as long as they support Apple's AI suite.

The iPad can do a lot the HomeView can't

It might sound like the HomeView and the iPad are surprisingly similar, but there's a wide array of features that are exclusive to Apple's dedicated tablet. Perhaps most importantly, you have a dedicated OS to work with on iPad. It might not be macOS, but you can run multiple apps side-by-side, including with desktop-like window management, if you'd like. Speaking of apps, you'll have many more options on iPad than on HomeView. It's great that there's third-party support on HomeView, but your iPad can also tap into the entire App Store; HomeView can't.

iPads have mouse and keybord support as well, in case you don't want to rely on gesture and touch controls for everything. There's also Apple Pencil support; optional, but useful. And while both devices have front-facing cameras, all iPads have rear cameras—some better than others, but they come in handy. If you're on a FaceTime call, you don't have to turn the entire device to show someone something in front of you. There's a host of other smaller features that may matter to some, but not all, like a USB-C port, or external drive support.

The HomeView has exclusive features of its own

On the flip side, there are perks you get with a HomeView that you just don't get on an iPad. While you can place an iPad on a stand in your kitchen, you won't be able to take advantage of HomeView's dedicated "faces." That includes the Home face, which puts all your smart devices on-screen in tiles. If your home is relatively smart, this is useful (not to mention sleek), and is a bit more streamlined than moseying over to the Home app on your iPad. To that point, HomeView's other faces make it stand out in your room: You can use it as a dynamic clock or calendar, with fun designs and effects. Even the Weather app's face looks better on HomeView than the Weather app on iPad.

The HomeView really shines if you have multiple people in your house—at least, on paper. Apple says the device can recognize up to six different users, and personalize the experience to each. You can have a custom Home Screen layout, and only be able to access your own data (like Messages); then, when a different member of your household looks at HomeView, they can access their personal setup. This type of personalization is great, and is sorely missing from the iPad. Hopefully, Apple adds profiles to iPadOS at some point in the future, like it does on macOS. Until then, HomeView offers a much better experience for multiple users.

HomeView also has the advantage when it comes to speakers—particularly if you buy the model with the stand. Apple says the screen comes with two full-range drivers, while the base has a down-firing woofer and two force-canceling passive radiators. If you opted for an iPad on a stand, you'd need some sort of external audio solution to match that, which would only increase your costs.

The HomeView's price actually makes sense

If you're torn on buying an iPad as a HomeView alternative, the cost might just be the decision maker here. Apple is pricing the HomeView on a stand at $299, which, to me, sounds a bit pricey at first. But you get a lot for that money, especially when you consider the other option: Apple's cheapest iPad is still quite expensive, retailing for $449. The iPad mini, which gives you a more comparable display size to the HomeView, is even more expensive. Your best bet would be to find a refurbished iPad, but even then, you're likely still spending more than the cost of the HomeView. That's before you factor in a stand, or even alternative audio solutions, like a Bluetooth speaker or HomePod mini.

If you plan to use your iPad as a dedicated tablet in addition to a smart home display, that additional cost might be worth it. After all, you can switch from taking FaceTime calls in the kitchen to sending emails, making music in GarageBand, or playing games like Minecraft and Stardew Valley. But if your main goal is finding a smart display that fits in well with your existing Apple ecosystem, the HomeView isn't a bad buy.


from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/wm7x5vP

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Although October Prime Day is officially over, some significant deals on home-maintenance essentials are still available. One of the best is the Ecovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR Pro Robot Lawn Mower, now 37% off at an all-time low of $949.05 (originally $1,499.99).

The O1000 Pro can mow up to 0.25 acres and handle slopes of up to 45%, making it ideal for smaller suburban lawns that need regular upkeep. It uses LiDAR, a 3D time-of-flight sensor, and an AI camera to map and navigate, so it doesn't need perimeter wire or an RTK antenna. In the app, you can create zones and no-go areas, adjust cutting settings, and schedule mowing.

The built-in TruEdge trimmer is what sets it apart from many competitors. Unlike some robot mowers that still leave a strip for you to finish manually, this model has edge trimming integrated to reduce cleanup. Another perk is how quiet it is: The mower operates at just 61 dB (significantly quieter than a gas mower), though the trimmer can reach around 81 dB.

While it has a PIN and lift alarm, it doesn’t offer the same location-tracking protection as premium competitors, which could matter if your mower is accessible from the street. Still, if your lawn is a quarter acre or less, somewhat level, and regularly maintained, the wireless Ecovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR Pro Robot Lawn Mower can handle most of your weekly mowing needs—and is even more appealing at nearly $550 off.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team

from Lifehacker https://ift.tt/toVlh08